Legal Opinion

Ramminger v. Archdiocese of Cincinnati, C-060706 (6-29-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 2007No. C-060706PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Dale Ramminger, appeals the summary judgment entered by the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas in favor of defendants-appellees, the Archdiocese of Cincinnati, Archbishop Daniel Pilarczyk (collectively, "the Archdiocese"), and Raymond E. Larger, in a suit alleging sexual assault.

RAMMINGER'S ALLEGATIONS

{¶ 2} In 2004, Ramminger made a claim under the Archdiocese's Claim Resolution Fund for Victims of Sexual Abuse. The basis of the claim was that Larger had sexually abused him in the years 1995 through 1997, when Ramminger was a minor and Larger was a priest…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Howard v. FerreriOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Doe v. Archdiocese of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Jim Fitzgerald and Ellen J. Rindal, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Chrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  4. Jorg v. Cincinnati Black United FrontOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Diamond v. Davis Bakery, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Caruso v. National City Mortgage Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Kocher v. Ascent Resources-Utica, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API