Jorg v. Cincinnati Black United Front
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Mark P. Painter, Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant R. Blaine Jorg appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of his defamation claim against defendants-appellees Cincinnati Black United Front (“CBUF”) and Damon Lynch III. The trial court held that the statements made by CBUF and Lynch were opinions, meaning that they were protected speech under the Ohio Constitution, and granted CBUF’s and Lynch’s motion for summary judgment. We agree that the statements were opinions and affirm the trial court’s ruling.
I. Letter Urges a Boycott
{¶ 2} Jorg is a former Cincinnati police officer. CBUF is a civil…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Doe v. ShafferOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Bertell Ollman v. Rowland Evans, Robert NovakCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Scott v. News-HeraldOhio Supreme Court · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Bentkowski v. Scene MagazineCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Thomas v. Telegraph Pub. Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- Olthaus v. NiesenOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- Brown v. LawsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
- Fuchs v. Scripps Howard Broadcasting Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.