Legal Opinion
Small v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 11, 1973No. 6493PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERN, Associate Judge:
Once again we are called upon to determine whether the trial court has complied with the sentencing provision of the Federal Youth Corrections Act, 18 U.S.C. § 5001 et seq. See Paul v. United States, D.C.App., 301 A.2d 226 (1973); Hubb v. United States, D.C.App., 298 A.2d 512 (1972). Section 5010(d) provides that:
If the court shall find that the youth offender will not derive benefit from treatment under subsection (b) or (c), then the court may sentence the youth offender under any other applicable penalty provision. (Emphasis added.)
Quite recently, two federal circuit…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Earl French Cox, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. William T. CoefieldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Foster v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Jackson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Nancy H. Steorts v. American Airlines, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Tribble v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Taylor v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.