Legal Opinion
Earl French Cox, Jr. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 29, 1973No. 71-1384PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge:
A majority of a divided panel of this Court concluded:(1) That the juvenile defendant was entitled to a limited hearing before the *335Attorney General could direct that he be proceeded against as an adult, and(2) That, having been tried as an adult, a sentence under the Federal Youth Corrections Act was mandatory, unless the trial court found that the youthful offender “will not derive benefit from treatment” under that Act.
A petition for rehearing en banc was granted and, after an en banc rehearing, a majority of the Court is in agreement with the dissenting member of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carlson v. LandonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Manduley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- John Doe v. William H. Webster, Director, FbiCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- State v. CainSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Jahnke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.