Legal Opinion
Home Insurance v. Waycrosse, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 13, 1996No. Civ. 3-95-1056PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KYLE, District Judge.
Introduction
Plaintiff Home Insurance Company (“Home Insurance”) commenced this action (“Insurance Action”) in the Northern District of California seeking a declaration that it did not have a duty to defend or indemnify Defendants for claims raised in a separate civil action filed against Defendants and others styled Life Point Systems, Inc. et al. v. Cargill, Inc., No. 93-20352, pending in the Northern District of California (“Life Point Action”). The present lawsuit was subsequently transferred to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Irma BARGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ANHEUSER-BUSCH, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- James W. McCarty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- James X. Mullen and Mullen Advertising, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Home Insurance Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance of PittsburghSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Winklevoss Consultants, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- Butts v. Royal Vendors, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Home Insurance Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance of PittsburghCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.