Legal Opinion

Home Insurance Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance of Pittsburgh

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 2, 2002No. C1-01-1429PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERT H. SCHUMACHER, Judge.

Appellant insurance company initiated this action against respondent insurance companies, seeking reimbursement for defense costs incurred in defending a lawsuit involving their common insureds. Appellant-intervenor insureds joined the lawsuit thereafter, by way of a complaint in intervention. The district court granted respondent insurance companies’ motions for summary judgment, ruling that neither respondent had an obligation under their respective insurance policies to provide a defense, and, accordingly, appellant insurance company was not entitled to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  2. Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  5. Hill v. Okay Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Home Insurance Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance of PittsburghSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  2. Talen v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API