Home Insurance Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance of Pittsburgh
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT H. SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Appellant insurance company initiated this action against respondent insurance companies, seeking reimbursement for defense costs incurred in defending a lawsuit involving their common insureds. Appellant-intervenor insureds joined the lawsuit thereafter, by way of a complaint in intervention. The district court granted respondent insurance companies’ motions for summary judgment, ruling that neither respondent had an obligation under their respective insurance policies to provide a defense, and, accordingly, appellant insurance company was not entitled to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Hill v. Okay Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Home Insurance Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance of PittsburghSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Talen v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002