Legal Opinion
Winklevoss Consultants, Inc. v. Federal Insurance
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 22, 1998No. 97 C 1621PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CASTILLO, District Judge.
Today we issue our third opinion in this insurance coverage dispute in an attempt to bring an end to this piecemeal litigation. Earlier this year, this Court ruled that defendant Federal Insurance Company had no duty to defend plaintiff Winklevoss Consultants under insurance policy provisions for “advertising injury” against a lawsuit entitled Lynchval Systems, Inc. v. Chicago Consulting Actuaries, 1998 WL 151814 (1998) et al. That ruling was limited, at Winklevoss’ insistence, to the original complaint filed in the Lynchval suit. Because…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Wilkin Insulation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Lapham-Hickey Steel Corp. v. Protection Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- Sheets v. Brethren Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Travelers Insurance Companies v. Penda CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lexmark International, Inc. v. Transportation InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- KNOLL PHARMACEUTICAL v. Auto. Ins. Co. of HartfordDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
- Superformance International, Inc. v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2002
- Green4All Energy Solutions, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2017
- Harleysville Mutual Insurance v. Buzz Off Insect Shield, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.