Legal Opinion
The Oceano
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 2, 1906PublishedCited by 28 opinions
In Admiralty. On exceptions to report of Herbert Green, Esq., commissioner.
1Opinion of the Court
HOUGH, District Judge.
The libelant chartered the Océano for a voyage from Philadelphia to Japan. The charter party provided that “funds for the vessel’s disbursements” * * * shall be “advanced by the charterer, on account of the freight, to the master, at the port of loading” * * * “such advance to be deducted in all cases from the freight earned under this charter party; and the master shall so receipt for the advance on the bills of lading.” Funds for necessary disbursements were accordingly furnished by the libelant, a bill of lading duly issued for the cargo, and a receipt for the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- The Monte A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1882
- The DirectorDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1886
- George D. Emery Co. v. Tweedie Trading Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1905
- Church v. SheltonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1855
3Cited by28 opinions
- Osaka Shosen Kaisha v. Pacific Export Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Rainbow Line, Inc. v. M/v Tequila (Ex Linglee), Her Engines, Tackle, Boiler, Equipment, Etc. Empire Commercial Corporation, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Krauss Bros. Lumber v. Dimon Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. Isthmian Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Navieros Inter-Americanos, S.A. v. M/V Vasilia ExpressCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.