Legal Opinion
George D. Emery Co. v. Tweedie Trading Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 19, 1905PublishedCited by 11 opinions
In Admiralty. On exceptions to answer and cross-libel.
1Opinion of the Court
ADAMS, District Judge.
The original action herein was brought by the George D. Emery Company against the Tweedie Trading Company to recover a balance of hire of the steamship Osceola for a half month from April 3, 1905, amounting to, less conceded deductions, $1,209.35.
The respondent in its answer after some denials and claims, alleged:
“Seventh. Further answering the libel herein the respondent alleges that the Steamship Osceola arrived at the port of New York on or about the 10th day of April, 1905, and was there detained at quarantine for one day and nineteen and one-half hours by reason of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Ayres v. CarverSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- The" Dove"Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Electro-Dynamic Co. v. The ElectronDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1891
- Hastorf v. Degnon-McLean Contracting Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Washington-Southern Navigation Co. v. Baltimore & Philadelphia Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- United States v. Isthmian Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United Transportation & Lighterage Co. v. New York & Baltimore Transp. LineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
- Clyde Commercial Steamships, Ltd. v. United States Shipping Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1907
- The OceanoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1906
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.