Legal Opinion
Lay v. Hass
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 2, 2002No. 27767-1-IIPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
51 P.3d 130 (2002)
112 Wash.App. 818
Ernest LAY and Linda Lay, husband and wife; and Harvey Lay and Esther Lay, husband and wife, Respondents,
v.
Stephen HASS and Diane Hass, husband and wife, Appellants.
No. 27767-1-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
August 2, 2002.
Shelly K. Speir, Tacoma, for Appellants.
Brian Lloyd McCoy, Puyallup, for Respondents.
BRIDGEWATER, J.
Defendants Stephen and Diane Hass appeal the trial court's order awarding nominal damages and attorney fees,[1] under RCW 4.84.250, to plaintiffs Ernest and Linda Lay. We hold that a filing of a motion for nominal damages and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Boeing Company v. Sierracin CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Bowles v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Fisher Properties, Inc. v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Beckmann v. Spokane Transit AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Hanson v. EstellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Becerra v. City of WardenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Kalich v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Lindsay v. Pacific Topsoils, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Kalich v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Target National Bank v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.