Legal Opinion

Target National Bank v. Higgins

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 20, 2014No. 31575-4-IIIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFearing, J.

¶1 Target National Bank sued Jeanette Higgins for defaulting on a credit card debt. The trial court granted Higgins’ motion for summary judgment. As the prevailing party, Higgins requested $11,076 in reasonable *169attorney fees and costs under both RCW 4.84.250 and RCW 4.84.330, respectively labeled the “small claims settlement statute” and the “reciprocal attorney fees clause statute.” The trial court denied fees under RCW 4.84.250, ruling that Higgins gave no notice that she sought fees under the statute. The trial court granted Higgins fees and costs under the Target contract and RCW 4.84.330…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Bowers v. Transamerica Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Brand v. DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRIESWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Scott Fetzer Co. v. WeeksWashington Supreme Court · 1993

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Elliott Bay Adjustment Co., Inc., Res. v. Caren DacumosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  2. Isaac Gordon v. Robinhood Financial LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024
  3. Robert Gunn, V Terry & Petra RielyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  4. T & B Washington, Inc., Dba v. Virginia DullantyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  5. T & B Washington, Inc., dba v. Virginia DullantyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API