Legal Opinion

Lindsay v. Pacific Topsoils, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 29, 2005No. 54487-0-IPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 James Lindsay won a favorable verdict on his employment claim against Pacific Topsoils, Inc. (PTI). Lindsay appeals the trial court’s characterization of PTI’s payment into the court’s registry as a partial satisfaction of judgment, which stopped the accrual of interest. Lindsay disputed the amount of the judgment and argues that because PTI’s payment required that he accept the payment as judgment in full, it was a conditional payment, and interest should have continued to run until disbursement. We agree with Lindsay and reverse and remand for determination of the appropriate amount of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Ins.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Larry Weyant, Charles Weyant v. George S. Okst, Irvin Richard Weber, Joseph Peter Auberger, Lawrence MuellerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  4. Tradewell Group, Inc. v. MavisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  5. Mayer v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Woo v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  2. Woo v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. Guillen v. ContrerasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. Guillen v. ContrerasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. McGINNITY v. Autonation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API