Legal Opinion

Bowles v. Department of Retirement Systems

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1993No. 58159-2PublishedCited by 171 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

Members of the Public Employees' Retirement System Plan I (PERS I) filed a class action suit against the Department of Retirement Systems contending the Department was improperly calculating retirement pensions. The plaintiffs argued the Department's calculations do not sufficiently take into account the compensation PERS I employees receive upon retirement in the form of lump sum payments of accrued vacation and sick leave benefits (hereafter referred to as "leave cashouts").

The trial court granted partial summary judgment in favor of each party. The trial court rejected the plaintiffs'…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Six (6) Mexican Workers v. Arizona Citrus Growers Bodine Produce Company, Inc. Robert Fletcher, D/B/A Fletcher FarmsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Bowers v. Transamerica Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Seattle School District No. 1 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by171 opinions

  1. Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. PUD DISTRICT NO. 1, KLICKITAT COUNTY v. International Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Yakima County (West Valley) Fire Protection District No. 12 v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. CJC v. Corporation of Catholic BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Laffitte v. Robert Half International Inc.California Supreme Court · 2016

166 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API