Legal Opinion

Schuylkill Navy v. Langbord

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 9, 1999PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, J.:

¶ 1 Appellants, Schuylkill Navy, a Pennsylvania Corporation, Edward Lucas, F.C. Graham, Michael Bowers, Joseph Sweeney, and Thomas Dowd (“Appellants”) have asked us to determine whether the trial court erred in sustaining Appellees’ preliminary objections to Appellants’ amended complaint and dismissing the complaint with prejudice. We hold that preliminary objections should not be sustained solely on the ground that the preliminary objections are uncontested or unopposed. We also hold that where a cause of action is subject to a judgment of non pros, a subsequent complaint on the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Smith v. WeaverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Doe v. RaezerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Bucci v. Detroit Fire & Marine Ins.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Harley Davidson Motor Co., Inc. v. HartmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Toczylowski v. General Bindery Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Grose v. Procter & Gamble Paper ProductsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Clark, C. v. Peugh, W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  3. Khalil, A. v. Cole, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Buchleitner v. PererSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Helfrick v. UPMC Shadyside Hospital, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County2003

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API