Legal Opinion

Framlau Corp. v. Delaware County

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 11, 1972No. Appeal, 1388PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cercone, J.,

The problem in this case relates to the sufficiency of plaintiff’s amended complaint which, with the exception of the first count, was dismissed by the lower court on defendant’s preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer.

Apparently, plaintiff filed its amended complaint “as of course” following defendant’s preliminary objections to the original complaint since the record is silent on any lower court action on the original complaint.

We agree with the lower court’s decision holding the amended complaint inadequate and dismissing four of the fire counts contained…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Baltimore Steamship Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Sullivan v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Savitz v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. LERAMAN v. RudolphSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Winters v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. BAKER v. RANGOSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Giffear v. Johns-Manville Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Del Turco v. Peoples Home Savings Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Hillbrook Apartments, Inc. v. Nyce Crete Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Banker v. Valley Forge InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API