Legal Opinion

Tiger River Pine Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 4, 1931No. 13290PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Bonham.

The respondent is a corporation engaged in the sawmill business. The defendant is a corporation engaged in the business of indemnity insurance. It is alleged in the complaint that the defendant corporation insured the plaintiff corporation “against any loss for any liability imposed by law upon the plaintiff for damages on account of bodily injuries, including death, resulting therefrom accidentally suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by any employee of the insured while engaged within his employment, subject to the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Attleboro Mfg. Co. v. Frankfort Marine, Accident & Plate Glass Ins.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1917
  2. Douglas v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1924
  3. Wisconsin Zinc Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Rumford Falls Paper Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1899
  5. New Orleans C.R. Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Toy v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Auto Mutual Indemnity Co. v. ShawSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  3. Tyger River Pine Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  4. Francis v. NewtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  5. Radcliffe v. Franklin National InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1956

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API