Legal Opinion
Toy v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 18, 2007No. 33 & 34 WAP 2005PublishedCited by 304 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*24 OPINION
Chief Justice CAPPY.
In this civil action, Appellant/Cross-Appellee Georgina Toy (“Toy”) brought several causes of action against Appellees/Cross-Appellants Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“Metropolitan Life”) and one of its sales representatives, Bob Martini (“Martini”) (collectively, “Defendants”). We granted review to consider (1) the purview of the bad faith statute, 42 Pa.C.S. § 8371 (“ § 8371”); (2) whether justifiable reliance is an element of the claims Toy brought under the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (“Consumer Protection Law”), 73 P.S. § 201-1 et…
2Cases cited93 opinions
- Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Arnold v. National County Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
- Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- G. A. Stowers Furniture Co. v. American Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by304 opinions
- Bruno, D., Aplts. v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Summers v. CERTAINTEED CORP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Rancosky v. Washington National Ins. Co., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Atiyeh v. National Fire Ins. Co. of HartfordDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Hunt v. United States Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
299 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.