Legal Opinion

Radcliffe v. Franklin National Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1956PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from a judgment which the circuit court entered in favor of the defendants after it had directed the jury to return its verdict for them. The plaintiffs are R. Heber Radcliffe and Ruth H. Radcliffe, husband and wife. The defendants are Franklin National Insurance Company of New York and United National Indemnity Company of New York. The plaintiff, R. Heber Radcliffe, is the insured in a policy of automobile liability insurance, which describes an automobile owned by him, and which was issued October 2, 1947, by the defendants. The latter unite in issuing…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. G. A. Stowers Furniture Co. v. American Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Hilker v. Western Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Southern Fire & Casualty Co. v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
  4. Abrams v. Factory Mutual Liability InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Attleboro Mfg. Co. v. Frankfort Marine, Accident & Plate Glass Ins.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1917

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Toy v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Brown v. Guarantee InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Georgetown Realty, Inc. v. Home InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Farris v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Groce v. Fidelity General Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API