Legal Opinion
Tyger River Pine Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided July 17, 1933No. 13669PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Bonham.
Erwin Chesser was, in January, 1928, in the employ of the respondent at its lumber mill in Union County, S. C. On the 18th day of January he suffered an injury while engaged in the duties of his employment which resulted in the permanent injury of one of his arms. The Tyger River Pine Company carried a policy in Maryland Casualty Company which insured it for any sum not exceeding $5,000.00 it might be called on to pay for injuries suffered by any of its employees. Efforts at settlement of any claim Chesser might make against…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Attleboro Mfg. Co. v. Frankfort Marine, Accident & Plate Glass Ins.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1917
- Rumford Falls Paper Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1899
- Georgia Casualty Company v. MannCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Tiger River Pine Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- Cavanaugh v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Auto Mutual Indemnity Co. v. ShawSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Nichols v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
- Southern Fire & Casualty Co. v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. Prairie Framing, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Zumwalt v. Utilities InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.