Legal Opinion
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Brown
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 2, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2009-1423PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GLADYS KESSLER, District Judge.
Plaintiff United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “the Commission”) brings this civil action against Defendant Gary A. Prince (“Prince”) alleging violations of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 77a et seq., the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78a et seq., and various Rules promulgated under the Exchange Act. On December 10, 2012 through January 4, 2013, the Court held a bench trial in which fifteen witnesses testified. Based on the testimony presented by those witnesses,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Aaron v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Richard Drake v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- ['U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. E-SMART TECHNOLOGIES, INC.']District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. E-Smart Technologies, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. China Infrastructure Investment Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. E-Smart Technologies, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Puddu v. 6D Global Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.