Legal Opinion
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. E-Smart Technologies, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 12, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2011-0895PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge
This case continues to provide a cautionary tale for investors. At the center of the story is pro se Defendant Mary Grace, the CEO of e-Smart Technologies, Inc., a public company that was in the business of developing and marketing purported biometric “smart” cards. Over the course of several years, the company touted significant technological advancements in SEC filings and press releases. At the same time, Grace persuaded investors to part with millions of dollars on assurances that the company was about to obtain or had…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. RPM Int'l, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. E-Smart Technologies, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. E-Smart Technologies, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. BlackburnDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2015
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nutra Pharma CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.