Legal Opinion

Puddu v. 6D Global Technologies, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 6, 2017No. 15 Civ. 8061PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Sweet, D.J.

Defendants 6D Global Technologies, Inc. (“6D”), Tejune Kang (“Kang”), Mark Szyn-kowski (“Szynkowski”), and Terry McEwen (“McEwen” and, collectively, the “6D Defendants” or the “Defendants”) have moved pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Fed. R. Civ. P., to dismiss the second amended complaint (“SAC”) of plaintiffs Joseph Puddu, Mark Ghitis, Valery Burlak, and Adam Butter (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”). Based upon the conclusions set forth below, the motion of the 6D Defendants is granted, and the SAC is dismissed.

I. Prior Proceedings

The Plaintiffs filed their putative class action…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Puddu v. NYGG (ASIA), LTD.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022
  2. Puddu v. NYGG (ASIA), LTD.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022
  3. Puddu v. NYGG (ASIA), LTD.District Court, S.D. New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API