Legal Opinion
Landry v. Acme Flour Mills Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 19, 1949No. 32898PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, C.J.
This is an action wherein recovery is sought for the conscious pain and suffering of plaintiff’s decedent as a result of the alleged negligence of defendant. Recovery for his wrongful death was had in another and different action and is not here involved.
The facts are simple and the sole question presented is whether or not the action is barred by the statute of limitations.
C. M. Griffith, while employed by the defendant, Acme Flour Mills Company, was injured June 21, 1943, under such circumstances that he would have been entitled to an award under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brown v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Goode, Adm'x.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Davis v. RailwaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890
- Needham v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1865
- Dennison v. PayneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Cruse v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Tulsa Industrial Authority v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- Ouellette v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Kimberly v. DeWittCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.