Legal Opinion

Beckham v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 29, 1962No. 516PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

137 So.2d 99 (1962)

William Lee BECKHAM, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY et al., Defendants and Relators.

No. 516.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

January 29, 1962.

Guillory, Guillory & Guillory, by Robert K. Guillory, Eunice, for plaintiff-respondent.

Davidson, Meaux, Onebane & Donohoe, by John A. Bernard, Lafayette, for defendants-relators.

Gold, Hall & Skye, by Leo Gold, Alexandria, for intervenor-appellee.

Before TATE, FRUGÉ, SAVOY, HOOD and CULPEPPER, JJ.

CULPEPPER, Judge.

Relators are defendants in a tort action filed by plaintiff for damages for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. California Trust Co. v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Omri E. Daniels, Jr., Barge Hiskey and Bentley M. McMullin v. C. Sewell ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  3. Tonn v. Inner Shoe Tire Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Simmesport State Bank v. ScallanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Smith v. Hanover Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Henderson v. HassurCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1977
  3. Wilkinson v. HusserLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. McDonald v. BookLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Airwork Service Division v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API