Legal Opinion

O'Meara v. Swortfiguer

California Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1923No. S. F. No. 10051PublishedCited by 33 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, C. J.

This is an action to recover for personal injuries resulting to the plaintiff by reason of a collision between her and an automobile operated by the defendant at the intersection of Jones and O’Farrell Streets, in the city of San Francisco, on the sixth day of September, 1919. The defendant was proceeding westerly along 0 ’Farrell Street and the plaintiff had alighted from a north-bound Jones Street car to transfer to a north-bound cable car which turned into Jones Street northerly from O’Farrell Street. Defendant’s automobile had been following the O’Farrell Street car which turned from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Burgesser v. Bullock'sCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Oettinger v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Clement v. State Reclamation BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Henderson v. Harnischfeger Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Delos v. Farmers Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Palmer v. TschudyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API