Legal Opinion

Estate of Treat

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1948PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

The sole question raised in the appeal is, who is entitled to the testatrix’s jewelry, Grace Painter or the residuary legatees ? The answer to this question is in paragraph IV of the will of Nellie S. Treat which provides :

“I give and bequeath to the said Grace Painter all furniture, household goods, ornaments and personal effects located in my dwelling in the city of Monroe of which I shall be the owner and shall be in possession at the time of my death.”

In construing a will the most important rule to be followed is, of course, the one which requires that the general intent of the testator,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Benner v. MauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Will of Buchanan v. BuchananWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Melville v. Union Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Department of Public Welfare v. First National Bank of Chippewa FallsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Baker v. Marine National Exchange Bank of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Estate of RhodesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Marsh v. Delta Gamma Anchor Center for Blind ChildrenColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Baker v. Marine National Exchange Bank of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API