Legal Opinion

Engel v. Smith

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1890PublishedCited by 43 opinions

Error to Macomb. (Canfield, J.) Negligence case. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCahill, J.

This suit was commenced by declaration to recover for injuries received by plaintiff by his falling through a trap-door in the store of defendants on January 26, 1888.

The building of defendants had, prior to their entry therein, been occupied by one Morehouse as a hardware store. Plaintiff had been employed by Morehouse as a tinsmith. The shop in which he worked was on the second floor. Plaintiff's only means of access to the shop in which he worked for Morehouse was by way of the front door of the store, and up inside stairs; at that time there being no stairs to the rear door of the store.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dundas v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Grand Rapids & Indiana R. R. v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Palmer v. HarrisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. J. G. Christopher Co. v. RussellSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
  2. Nezworski v. MazanecMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Gornstein v. PriverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. Montague v. HansonMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Corrigan v. ElsingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API