Southern Pac. R.R. v. Dufour
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
This is an action to restrain respondent from unlawfully diverting certain waters claimed to have been appropriated by appellant under the provisions of the Civil Code. Judgment went for defendant, and this appeal is. prosecuted from the judgment and order denying the motion for a new trial. The Endings of the court are not attacked, and the facts of the case may be briefly stated as follows: In the year 1888, Du-four acquired title to section 36 of a certain township, and range situated in Kern County. Prior to this event said realty was the property of the state. Upon this tract'of land was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hanson v. McCueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Trustees & Inhabitants of Delhi v. YoumansNew York Supreme Court · 1867
- State v. Central Pacific RailroadNevada Supreme Court · 1871
- Anderson v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Ely v. FergusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by46 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. PomeroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Gornstein v. PriverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Case v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Johndrow v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Brattain v. HerronIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.