Legal Opinion
Harris v. Pameco Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 4, 2000No. 9405-03305; CA A92496PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court granted directed verdicts in defendants’ favor at the close of plaintiffs case and at the close of all the evidence on certain claims in his amended complaint. ORCP 60. He assigns error to the trial court’s dismissal of his claims for battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligence and employment discrimination under ORS 659.030(l)(b). The directed verdicts were appropriate only if defendants were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Lindstrand v. Transamerica Title Ins. Co., 127 Or App 693, 695, 874 P2d 82…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Johnson v. Transportation Agency, Santa Clara Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- McGanty v. StaudenrausOregon Supreme Court · 1995
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Dawson v. Entek InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Justice v. Rockwell Collins, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- Shepard v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2011
- McLean v. Pine Eagle School District, No. 61District Court, D. Oregon · 2016
- Herbert v. Altimeter, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.