Conlan v. Bonta'
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POLLAK , J.
Petitioners and appellants (petitioners) are three beneficiaries of California’s Medi-Cal program, a state-administered participant in the federal Medicaid program. Petitioners Asher Schwarzmer and Kevin Conlan requested and received fair hearings at which each asked an administrative law judge (ALJ) to order the State Department of Health Services (DHS or the Department) to reimburse him directly for covered expenses that he had paid while his Medi-Cal application was pending. Petitioner Thomas Stevens requested a fair hearing to recover reimbursement for copayments he had…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Palermo v. Stockton Theatres, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Payne v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Richmond v. Dart Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Indep. Living Ctr. of S. Cal. v. Jennifer KentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- California Ass'n for Health Service at Home v. State Department of Health ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Cota v. Maxwell-JollyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Danser v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Santa Rosa Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Kent, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.