Santa Rosa Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Kent
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtPollak, J.
*201*814The California Legislature reduced Medicaid hospital payments 10 percent between 2008 and 2011 and the federal agency administering the Medicaid program approved the rate reductions. A group of hospitals allege the rate reductions violate sections 13(A) and 30(A) of the Medicaid Act ( 42 U.S.C. § 1396 et seq. (Medicaid Act) ), which set out, respectively, procedural and substantive requirements the state must follow when establishing reimbursement rates. ( 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a).) Plaintiffs appeal from the denial of their petitions for a writ of mandate seeking to declare the rates void…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Douglas v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Robert F. Kennedy Medical Center v. BelsheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Managed Pharmacy Care v. Kathleen SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Indep. Living Ctr. of S. Cal. v. Jennifer KentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Hoag Mem'l Hosp. Presbyterian v. Kent, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- RONALD GOLDMAN & others v. SECRETARY OF THE EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2022
- Rivera v. Kent, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Allied Anesthesia Medical Group v. Inland Empire Health PlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.