Legal Opinion

Cota v. Maxwell-Jolly

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 24, 2010No. Case C 09-3798 SBAPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge.

Plaintiffs are elderly persons and adults with physical and mental disabilities who bring the instant class action suit on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated against Defendants California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) and its Director, David Maxwell-Jolly, to enjoin funding cuts as mandated by Assembly Bill ABx4 5 (ABx4 5) in the Medi-Cal Adult Day Health Care (ADHC) program. The Court previously entered a preliminary injunction preventing Defendants from reducing the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Olmstead v. L.C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Henry Pashby v. Albert DeliaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  2. WeRide Corp. v. Kun HuangDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
  3. M.R. v. DreyfusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Dunn v. DunnDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2016
  5. Strouchler v. ShahDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API