Bradley v. Appalachian Power Co.
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Justice:
In these two cases, which have been consolidated on appeal, we are asked to re-examine and ameliorate the common law doctrine of contributory negligence.
In each case the plaintiff sought by way of an instruction to utilize the doctrine of comparative negligence to avoid the defense of contributory negligence. The ten dered instruction was rejected and the usual contributory negligence instruction was given, with the jury returning a verdict for the defendant in each case.
I
The doctrine of contributory negligence is generally thought to have originated in the English common law…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Hoffman v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by276 opinions
- McIntyre v. BalentineTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- Alvis v. RibarIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Harless v. First National Bank in FairmontWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- Gustafson v. BendaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Hilen v. HaysKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
271 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.