Legal Opinion

McIntyre v. Balentine

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1992PublishedCited by 394 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

In this personal injury action, we granted Plaintiff’s application for permission to appeal in order to decide whether to adopt a system of comparative fault in Tennessee. We are also asked to determine whether the criminal presumption of intoxication is admissible evidence in a civil case. We now replace the common law defense of contributory negligence with a system of comparative fault. Additionally, we hold that the criminal presumption of intoxication established by T.C.A. § 55-10-408(b) (1988) is admissible evidence in a civil case.

In the early morning darkness…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Hoffman v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  3. Alvis v. RibarIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Placek v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Bradley v. Appalachian Power Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1979

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by394 opinions

  1. Eaton v. McLainTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Overstreet v. Shoney's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  3. Northland Insurance Co. v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. GomezTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Coln v. City of SavannahTennessee Supreme Court · 1998

389 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API