State v. Chestnutt
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
Each warrant adopts the phraseology of Ch. 177, Session Laws of 1949, which, in defining the conduct declared to constitute a misdemeanor, provides: “SectioN 1. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation to engage in, promote, or in anywise participate in any motorcycle or other motor vehicle race or races on Sunday in Wake County, North Carolina.”
It is noteworthy that the warrant uses the conjunctive “and” where the statute uses the disjunctive “or.” The draftsman of the warrant was well advised. S. v. Albarty, 238 N.C. 130, 76 S.E. 2d 381.
The statute does not disclose a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. . LuedersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- State v. . DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- State v. AlbartySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. CochranSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- State v. DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. KirbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. RieraSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Williams v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of NCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.