Garrity v. Bituco Mfg. & Chemical Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Kephart,
Appellee, a widow, asked commutation of future installments payable under a compensation agreement arising from the death of her husband. The employer objected unless there was evidence to sustain the requirements of the act. No specific reason was assigned; the answer merely denied the right in the language of the act. Section 316 of the Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, 748, provides, “The compensation contemplated by this article may at any time be commuted by the board...... if it appear that such commutation will be for the best interest of the employee or the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pater v. Superior Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Lovasz v. Carnegie Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Ferdisko v. Trimble & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cymbor v. Binder Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Cogdill v. Aetna Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- Huskins v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Lubanski v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. MontroseCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.