Legal Opinion

Imes v. City of Fremont

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

This' was an action for damages resulting from personal injuries claimed to have been caused to the appellant, Edith Imes, by the negligence of the appellee, the city of Fremont. A general demurrer to the amended petition was sustained, and, the plaintiff not wishing to plead further, final judgment for the defendant was entered -and plaintiff appealed on questions of law.

The essential facts alleged in the amended petition are as follows:

The city of Fremont owns and operates a garbage disposal system in which it uses trucks manned by its agents, to collect garbage and other waste materials…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Scibilia v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Johnson v. Board of County Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. James Ex Rel. James v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Foss v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Hutchinson v. City of LakewoodOhio Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gomez v. City of Las VegasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Wold v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Ivory v. City of MontgomeryAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Broughton v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API