Legal Opinion

Ivory v. City of Montgomery

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 27, 1951No. 3 Div. 925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Presiding Judge.

The plaintiffs in this cause seek to recover damages to personal property on account of alleged negligence of agents or employees of the City of Montgomery while engaged in their duties of collecting trash or garbage.

The court below sustained demurrers to the complaint, and the plaintiffs suffered a non-suit and perfected this appeal. Title 7, Sec. 819, Code 1940.

There is a conflict among the authorities in the various jurisdictions as to whether or not the collection of garbage by a municipality is a governmental or corporate function.

The Supreme Court of our State has…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bolster v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Scibilia v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Johnson v. Board of County Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Moseley v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  5. City of Bessemer v. BarnettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brown v. City of FairhopeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  2. City of Birmingham v. ScoginSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  3. Town of Eclectic v. MaysSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Town of Eclectic v. MaysSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API