Legal Opinion

Citizens for Responsible Wildlife Management v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 2003No. 72186-6PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.

Citizens for Responsible Wildlife Management, on direct review to this court, claim that Initiative 713 violates Washington Constitution article II, sections 19 and 37. Finding that appellants have not shown, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Initiative 713 violates the constitution, we affirm the superior court’s denial of the summary judgment motion.

*627FACTS

Appellants, Citizens for Responsible Wildlife Management (Citizens), are a coalition of over 400 wildlife conservation, scientific, business, outdoor recreation, farming, timber, nuisance animal control, and wildlife management organizations…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. BroadawayWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. BroadawayWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. City of Redmond v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. American Legion Post 149 v. WASH. DEPT. OF HEALTHWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. American Legion Post No. 149 v. Department of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. City of Sequim v. MalkasianWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. City of Sequim v. MalkasianWashington Supreme Court · 2006

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API