Legal Opinion

Ranger Insurance v. Pierce County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 2008No. 80389-7PublishedCited by 172 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanders, J.

¶1 Pierce County applied money from Ranger Insurance Company, at the request of Ranger’s agent, to forfeited bonds underwritten by another surety. When the bonds were exonerated, Ranger’s funds were not returned. Ranger sued Pierce County for negligence. The trial court granted Pierce County summary judgment of dismissal, holding it met its duty to Ranger as a matter of law. Analyzing the issue as an agency problem the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court. We affirm the Court of Appeals reversal of summary judgment as material issues of fact exist under both duty and agency theories.

FACTU…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BehymerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Seven Gables Corp. v. MGM/UA Entertainment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. The Tj HooperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  5. Hertog v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by172 opinions

  1. Sanders v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Sanders v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Dowler v. Clover Park School District No. 400Washington Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Marisa Bavand v. Onewest Bank FsbCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  5. Sutton v. Tacoma School District No. 10Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014

167 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API