Michael v. Mosquera-Lacy
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSanders, J.
¶1 — Dr. Betsy Mosquera-Lacy, a periodontist employed by Bright Now! Dental, Inc., performed a bone grafting procedure on Mystie Michael using cow bone although Michael requested that no cow bone be used. Michael sued Bright Now and Dr. Mosquera-Lacy for Consumer Protection Act (CPA), chapter 19.86 RCW, violations. The trial court dismissed the complaint on summary judgment. The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court, holding that material issues of fact did exist. We now reverse the Court of Appeals. Bright Now is entitled to summary judgment of dismissal as a matter of law on the CPA…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Seven Gables Corp. v. MGM/UA Entertainment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Panag v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Trujillo v. Northwest Trustee Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2015
- Michael v. Mosquera-LacyWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Bavand v. OneWest Bank, FSBCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Shepard v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.