Legal Opinion

Dean v. Wilson Construction Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 14, 1960No. 464PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

The evidence does not support the allegations in plaintiff’s paragraph 15, quoted in the statement of facts. The evidence relating to these allegations tends to show: At times, when the work was in progress, onlookers, including small children, stood at the barricades and watched the operation of the machinery. At times, older boys watched from closer positions. Hylton, Stro'bel and Boder had watched from a bank on the Roberts property. Boder testified they “went off the bank and went -around right where they were working.” Strobel testified that at such time he got “within about 30 feet of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Briscoe v. Henderson Lighting & Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Tart Ex Rel. Tart v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Hood v. Queen City Coach CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Luttrell v. . Mineral Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Campbell v. . LaundrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bell v. PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Wiles v. MetzgerNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Hawkins v. HouserCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  4. Arnold Hashtani v. Duke Power Company, a Corporation of the State of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
  5. Herring v. HumphreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API