Legal Opinion
Ewald v. Royal Norwegian Embassy
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 6, 2014No. Civil No. 11-CV-2116 (SRN/SER)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Royal Norwegian Embassy’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 130]. Defendant submitted a supporting memorandum [Doc. No. 132], three affidavits [Doc. Nos. 133-135], and seven declarations [Doc. Nos. 136-37]. Plaintiff submitted an opposition memorandum [Doc. No. 142], seven declarations [Doc. Nos. 143-49], and an affidavit [Doc. No. 151]. And, Defendants filed a reply brief [Doc. No. 160]. The matter was heard on November 26, 2013. For the reasons stated below, the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Jin Ku Kim, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Nash Finch Company, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dunn v. Lyman School District 42-1District Court, D. South Dakota · 2014
- Nash v. Optomec, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
- Echologics, LLC v. Orbis Intelligent Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2022
- Ewald v. Royal Norwegian EmbassyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- VEBS, INC., a California Corporation v. LEON SIMONEAU, an individual, and DOES 1–10, inclusiveDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025