Legal Opinion

Jin Ku Kim, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Nash Finch Company, Appellee/cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 12, 1997No. 95-2012, 95-2074PublishedCited by 339 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1052McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.

Jin Ku Kim appeals from a final judgment entered in the District Court1 for the Northern District of Iowa, upon a jury verdict, finding in his favor and against Nash Finch Co. in his employment discrimination case but reducing the amount of damages awarded by the jury. For reversal, Kim argues the district court erred in denying his motion to amend the pleadings to conform to the evidence under Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(b) and in applying the Title VII cap, 42 U.S.C. § 1981a(b)(3), to limit compensatory and punitive damages. On cross-appeal, Nash Finch argues the district court…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by339 opinions

  1. Yanowitz v. L'OREAL USA, INC.California Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Judy G. Morris v. Oldham County Fiscal Court John W. Black, County Judge/executive Brent LikinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  3. Li Li Manatt v. Bank of America, NaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Reinee Hildebrandt v. Illinois Department of Natural Resources and Richard LittleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  5. O'Neal v. Ferguson Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001

334 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API