Legal Opinion

Ewald v. Royal Norwegian Embassy

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided December 31, 2014No. Case Civil No. 11-CV-2116 (SRN/SER)Published

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER FOR JUDGMENT

SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, District Judge.

This case arises out of a dispute concerning Plaintiff Ellen S. Ewald’s employment with Defendant Royal Norwegian Embassy (the “Embassy”). Plaintiff alleges pay discrimination, claiming that the Embassy violated the Equal Pay Act (the “EPA”), 29 U.S.C. § 206(d)(1), and the Minnesota Human Rights Act (“MHRA”), Minn.Stat. § 363A.08, Subd. 2. (Am. Compl. Counts III and VI [Doc. No. 104].) She also alleges that the Embassy violated Minn.Stat. § 181.64 by fraudulently inducing her to enter employment.…

2Cases cited62 opinions

Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
Donna Krenik v. County of Le SueurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
Federal Express Corp. v. HoloweckiSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.