Legal Opinion
Dunn v. Lyman School District 42-1
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided August 4, 2014No. CIV. 13-3004-RALPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROBERTO A. LANGE, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Plaintiff Mark Dunn (Dunn) filed an Amended Complaint against Defendant Lyman School District (School District) alleging violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., (Count I), a breach of fiduciary duty and duty of loyalty (Count II), and intentional infliction of emotional distress (Count III). Doc. 22. The School District moved for summary judgment, Doc. 41, which Dunn opposed, Doc. 51. For the reasons…
2Cases cited88 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Spann v. Neighbors Credit UnionDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022
- Velez v. AutoZoners, LLCDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2023