Rimmer v. Southern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, 0. J.
This is another crossing accident. The negligence of the defendant may be considered as established by the evidence. Johnson v. R. R., 205 N. C., 121, 170 S. E., 120.
The action was dismissed as in case of nonsuit on account of the contributory negligence of plaintiff’s intestate. Young v. R. R., 205 N. C., 530, 172 S. E., 177; Tart v. R. R., 202 N. C., 52, 161 S. E., 720; Eller v. R. R., 200 N. C., 527, 157 S. E., 800; High v. R. R., 112 N. C., 385, 17 S. E., 79. It was said in Davidson v. R. R., 171 N. C., 634, 88 S. E., 759, that “When a pedestrian, in the daytime, steps upon a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Redmon v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- High v. Carolina Central RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- Eller v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Tart Ex Rel. Tart v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Holton v. Kinston-Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Wagoner v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Mercer v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Burgess Ex Rel. Burgess v. MattoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Cummings v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Welch Ex Rel. Johnson v. JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.