Legal Opinion

Purcell v. Thaxton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 17, 1950No. 33205PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLuttrell, J.

This action was brought by plaintiffs, J. M. Thaxton and Lonie Thaxton, against the defendants, Bert A. Purcell, Fred A. Purcell, and J. W. Garr, seeking to construe a deed to lands in Oklahoma county, made by defendant Bert A. Purcell, which they alleged conveyed to them an undivided 6/16 interest in the oil, gas and other minerals under the land. They alleged that the deed was ambiguous, and that the defendants were *613asserting title to some portion of the oil, gas and other minerals conveyed to them thereby. The trial court overruled defendants’ demurrer to the petition, motion for judgment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carroll v. BowenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Melton v. SneedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Wilson v. OlsenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Rogers v. KinneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wynn v. Sklar & Phillips Oil CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  2. Public Service Co. of Oklahoma v. Home Builders Ass'n of RealtorsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  3. Elliott v. BerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Cutright v. RicheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  5. Hudson v. LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API