Legal Opinion

Cutright v. Richey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 21, 1953No. 35287PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELCH J.

This is an action brought by W. S. Richey and Eunice Richey against Ruhl K. Cutright and Martha Cutright, and numerous other parties, to quiet title to an undivided 70/160 mineral interest in and to 160 acres of land located in Washita county, Oklahoma.

It appears that on the 8th day of July, 1938,. plaintiffs, who were then the owners and holders of a fee-simple title to the land in question, executed a mineral deed to C. R. Walbert whereby they conveyed to him an undivided one-half mineral interest in and to said premises; that Walbert thereafter conveyed fractional mineral interests…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tong v. FeldmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  2. Kimbley v. LuckeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. York v. StoneWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Hodgkiss v. Northland Petroleum ConsolidatedMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Purcell v. ThaxtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. CALVERT v. SWINFORDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  2. Whitman v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  3. French Energy, Inc. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  4. Snadon v. GayerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. McSpadden v. MahoneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API