Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Marks v. Tenbrunsel

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 22, 2005No. 1031515PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

David Kenneth Marks sued Dr. Thomas W. Tenbrunsel, Dr. Lois H. Pope, and Alabama Psychological Services Center, LLC. The defendants filed a motion for a Rule 12(b)(6), Ala. R. Civ. P., dismissal of the case for failure to state a claim, which the trial court granted. Marks appeals; we affirm.

I. Facts and Procedural History

Marks contacted Alabama Psychological Services Center, LLC, to obtain psychological treatment. Marks met with Dr. Thomas W. Tenbrunsel, a…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Andrews v. Merritt Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Nance by and Through Nance v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. HodurskiSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. Fontenot v. BramlettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Gowens v. Tys. S. Ex Rel. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. Precision Gear Co. v. Continental Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  3. Balwin County Electric v. CatrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  4. Siniard v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  5. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. AustinSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API